Loading...
Projects / Programmes source: ARIS

Judicial Selection Under Scrutiny: Judicial Independence, Lawfulness and Merit

Research activity

Code Science Field Subfield
5.05.00  Social sciences  Law   

Code Science Field
5.05  Social Sciences  Law 
Keywords
Selection, appointment, promotion, judges, judiciary, judicial independence, tribunal established by law, merit, European standards, rule of law, procedural guarantees, informal practices, the Judicial council, court presidents, human rights.
Evaluation (metodology)
source: COBISS
Organisations (3) , Researchers (14)
1608  Institute for Comparative Law Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  29373  PhD Samo Bardutzky  Social sciences  Head  2022 - 2025  210 
2.  51259  Marjan Kos  Law  Researcher  2022 - 2025  78 
3.  39236  PhD Petra Lamovec Hren  Social sciences  Young researcher  2022 - 2023  24 
4.  27793  Saša Šest    Technical associate  2022 - 2025 
5.  29372  PhD Tilen Štajnpihler Božič  Law  Researcher  2022 - 2025  136 
6.  22362  PhD Saša Zagorc  Law  Researcher  2022 - 2025  429 
7.  14309  PhD Katarina Zajc  Economics  Researcher  2022 - 2025  392 
0504  Institute of Criminology at the Faculty of Law
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  50968  PhD Dean Lipovac  Law  Researcher  2024 - 2025  54 
2.  29615  PhD Mojca Mihelj Plesničar  Criminology and social work  Researcher  2022 - 2025  343 
3.  50631  PhD Pika Šarf  Law  Researcher  2023 - 2025  89 
0583  University of Ljubljana - Faculty of law
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  29373  PhD Samo Bardutzky  Social sciences  Researcher  2024  210 
2.  53958  PhD Kristina Čufar  Law  Researcher  2022 - 2024  61 
3.  54491  Mohor Fajdiga  Law  Researcher  2022 - 2025  88 
4.  19427  PhD Grega Strban  Law  Researcher  2022 - 2025  886 
Abstract
Excellent judges with an independent state of mind and high moral integrity are prerequisites for a good and independent judiciary. Therefore, it is essential that only the best lawyers become judges, that only the best judges are promoted to the most important positions within the judiciary, and that selection procedures ensure judicial independence and the lawfulness of the courts. The main research question that we address with this project can be summarized as follows: In what manner does the selection of Slovenian judges respect European standards of judicial independence and the lawfulness of the courts as well as the candidates’ merits, and does it respect them to a sufficient extent? In order to answer these questions, the project will first identify, analyse and critically assess the latest European standards concerning judicial independence and the lawfulness of courts. Secondly, it will determine the common understanding of merit, which should be the primary consideration in selection procedures for judges. Thirdly, it will analyse the wide range of questions concerning the selection (appointment and promotion) of Slovenian judges: from the controversial role of the legislative branch, procedural guarantees and the application of selection criteria in practice to the accessibility of selection procedures in relation to the diversity of the professional and social background of the candidates. Selection procedures will be scrutinised by employing a rich and thorough empirical research approach, combining qualitative (interviews and surveys) with quantitative (statistical) methods. Finally, the selection procedures for Slovenian judges will be evaluated from the perspective of the latest European standards concerning judicial independence and lawfulness of the courts and merit. By analysing the selection procedures for judges, we will aim to better understand and foster opportunities to enhance a high-quality and independent judiciary, which is a prerequisite for public confidence in the judiciary and a guarantee for the proper resolution of disputes and the protection of the parties' rights. In a system of separation of powers, a high-quality and independent judiciary checks the political branches, prevents the usurpation of power and is thus a key building block of the rule of law and democracy. At the same time, it reduces transaction costs and opportunistic behaviour in markets and positively impacts economic activity.
Views history
Favourite